I believe you are onto something (but not sure if it's correct), but then again, I willingly confess to being in the "crackpot" camp when it comes to the hard l

I believe you are onto something (but not sure if it's correct), but then again, I willingly confess to being in the "crackpot" camp when it comes to the hard limits that the current physics paradigm postulates. One such is that nothing can exceed the speed of light, another the constancy of the speed of light for all observers, regardless of the relative speeds of the observers vs the light source. The whole thing smacks too much of the mania that gripped the previous century, the belief that we might actually understand it all. We can't, just ever more. In my mind we might live in multiple (infinite?) universes that exists at different speeds (think millions of times the speed of light) and that only interact in such rare and odd circumstances that we only detect it using instruments that peer far into the unknown. I could be wrong.