2 ms·
Perhaps, but to the extent that the author is calling Mr. Chun's credibility into question, it seems important to get this bit right. According to Wikipedia, [
by gnicholas 3y ago
Perhaps, but to the extent that the author is calling Mr. Chun's credibility into question, it seems important to get this bit right.
According to Wikipedia, [1] it looks like he trademarked it, and held onto it for the next 20 years. It doesn't say what happened next, but apparently there is now a trademark for "the original aloha shirt since 1936" — very specific! [2]
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_shirt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_shirt
2: https://trademarks.justia.com/868/27/the-original-aloha-shirt-since-86827465.html https://trademarks.justia.com/868/27/the-original-aloha-shir...
- User23 3y agoThat gives me a tangential thought. I'm not a lawyer, so I'd be interested if one specializing in trademark could chime in. Is there any kind of veracity requirement for a trademark? Or is it simply a matter of uniqueness. For example, could I register and then market a paint as 12,000 BC Cave Paint(tm), so long as nobody else beat me to it? My strong hunch is that there is no such requirement.