So it’s perhaps true that AI will substantially decrease the cost of certain goods and services; how then does the author argue that most people will be using v

So it’s perhaps true that AI will substantially decrease the cost of certain goods and services; how then does the author argue that most people will be using virtual headsets to go to work? Wouldn’t the vast majority of jobs that could be done virtually instead be done by an AI? The Uber argument also doesn’t track for me. We are increasingly aware that cars and the infrastructure that goes towards supporting them is grossly inefficient. A massive waste of human lives and capital. Transportation certainly has the potential to become much cheaper, but it certainly won’t come about through self-driving vehicles.