3 ms·
Nobody's arguing that the heliocentric model wasn't better for a variety of reasons... simply that getting superseded doesn't make the previous approach 'not sc
by sdenton4 3y ago
Nobody's arguing that the heliocentric model wasn't better for a variety of reasons... simply that getting superseded doesn't make the previous approach 'not science.' All models are wrong, some are useful, and all that.
And the heliocentric model still has plenty of unexplained parameters: the major and minor radii for each body. (Not to mention those pesky perturbations in mercury's orbit.)