4 ms·
Actions like this are a mark of a company with excess staff. If someone is so bored that they took it upon themselves to require someone ride on a second leg of
by ajhurliman 3y ago
Actions like this are a mark of a company with excess staff. If someone is so bored that they took it upon themselves to require someone ride on a second leg of a trip, there’s probably some bloat in their org.
And how are they claiming they lost money due to skip lagging? If anything they’d gain money on the smaller amount of fuel needed for the second leg because he wasn’t on it.
The word kafkaesque becomes more relevant every day.
- deafpolygon 3y agoThey count it as lost money basically by saying that since there was an empty seat on the second leg (despite the fact that it was already paid-for by ticket) - therefore counting that against potential profit. It's bullshit accounting to spin things in their favor.