3 ms·

Just read the Wikipedia article about it... Srsly we have 2023 :-( And obviously other faces were calculated in like sun phase etc.... Even in hn people are

Just read the Wikipedia article about it... Srsly we have 2023 :-( And obviously other faces were calculated in like sun phase etc.... Even in hn people are not able to just research this properly :(

tracker1 3y ago
[flagged]
- _fs 3y ago
  Appeal to authority fallacy occurs when someone asserts a claim solely based on the authority or expertise of an individual or group, without considering the evidence supporting the claim. However, in the case of climate change, the scientific consensus is derived from a robust body of evidence and research conducted by thousands of scientists worldwide
  - tracker1 3y ago
    That said, the level of proof is mostly conjecture, contrast and comparison. There are a lot of other mitigating factors at play when we're talking about a solar system. It's not significantly different than what was pushed as the heart-health cholesterol hypothesis as fact for half a century, and was in fact wrong, dramatically wrong. The level of alarmism doesn't help. According to 2001, Florida should be underwater right now. And that is as we, as a global population haven't dramatically changed much of anything. I'll believe the alarmism, when treaty proposals don't draft out massive exclusions for India, China and African nations.
- ianburrell 3y ago
  Do you have an example? Because all of the variations in recorded history, the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, were less than 0.5C. Also, both were regional and came on over centuries. Also, the difference between the Ice Age and current interglacial was only 4C. The transition took 6000 years. We are approaching 1.5C and should hit 3C. That is the opposite of Ice Age in a century.
- Natuerich 3y ago
  [flagged]
karmakurtisaani 3y ago
When smart people decide not to accept a given fact no matter the evidence, they become really good at denying it. Instead of accepting the fact, there is always the next "what about ...?"

Just read the Wikipedia article about it... Srsly we have 2023 :-( And obviously other faces were calculated in like sun phase etc.... Even in hn people are not able to just research this properly :(

tracker1 3y ago

[flagged]

_fs 3y ago
Appeal to authority fallacy occurs when someone asserts a claim solely based on the authority or expertise of an individual or group, without considering the evidence supporting the claim. However, in the case of climate change, the scientific consensus is derived from a robust body of evidence and research conducted by thousands of scientists worldwide
- tracker1 3y ago
  That said, the level of proof is mostly conjecture, contrast and comparison. There are a lot of other mitigating factors at play when we're talking about a solar system. It's not significantly different than what was pushed as the heart-health cholesterol hypothesis as fact for half a century, and was in fact wrong, dramatically wrong. The level of alarmism doesn't help. According to 2001, Florida should be underwater right now. And that is as we, as a global population haven't dramatically changed much of anything. I'll believe the alarmism, when treaty proposals don't draft out massive exclusions for India, China and African nations.
ianburrell 3y ago
Do you have an example? Because all of the variations in recorded history, the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, were less than 0.5C. Also, both were regional and came on over centuries. Also, the difference between the Ice Age and current interglacial was only 4C. The transition took 6000 years. We are approaching 1.5C and should hit 3C. That is the opposite of Ice Age in a century.
Natuerich 3y ago
[flagged]

karmakurtisaani 3y ago

When smart people decide not to accept a given fact no matter the evidence, they become really good at denying it. Instead of accepting the fact, there is always the next "what about ...?"