4 ms·
There are definitely different use cases, but I generally find that complex black box tools are generally near perfect in practice. And a lot of the time, if t
by eternityforest 3y ago
There are definitely different use cases, but I generally find that complex black box tools are generally near perfect in practice.
And a lot of the time, if there's a bug in the low level thing, it's in a less commonly used feature, and you can often reframe your project to do things in the same way everyone else does things.
If someone else successfully used a complex framework, I assume I will be successful too, as long as I use it in exactly the same way as them. Sometimes that requires hacks that have a performance hit, but overall it cam still be faster than writing your own code that you wouldn't have time to optimize.
I pretty rarely try any tool I wouldn't want pinned, since I don't tend to play around with the single-function more experimental stuff, and gravitate towards one size fits all kind of stuff(If I need to play a sound, I'll just use mpv, regardless of if there is something lighter or I don't need the features).
If you are interested in tinkering at all then the whole thing goes out the window and complex tools become an "Abandon all hope" kind of thing though.
- skulk 3y agoI don't think you're aware of this but the individual you're responding to has a vendetta against Nix. Watch and you'll see shallow dismissals of Nix on every thread here by them. From what I can tell, they tried it once, got frustrated which hurt their ego a bit so they take it out on every post here. Either way I like your comment and will refer to it for my evangelizing.
- thumbuddy 3y agoIt's not a vendetta it's an opinion. I don't like a technology, they do. We had a reasonable conversation about our view points. I did try it, it wasn't for me. Just like how I tried COBOL and that wasn't for me. That's life.