to some degree it's not relevant -- the data is bunk, and Dan A flogged it hard. He also was the only one handling it, so if the data is bad then the responsib

to some degree it's not relevant -- the data is bunk, and Dan A flogged it hard. He also was the only one handling it, so if the data is bad then the responsibility falls to him regardless, both as the handler, as well as the head of the investigation. He either deliberately faked it, or got garbage data and didn't realize it when, now, plenty of others have.