7 ms·

This site doesn't even have half the problems as most social media. Ragebait is usually handled well, the incentives to troll/virtue signal are low (karma is no

This site doesn't even have half the problems as most social media. Ragebait is usually handled well, the incentives to troll/virtue signal are low (karma is not visible) and the level of discussion is usually high. And there is no customised feed, everyone sees the same thing.

adql 3y ago
...people look at other people's karma on reddit ?
- local_crmdgeon 3y ago
  The karma of individual comments absolutely changes the way people interact with them
  - ljm 3y ago
    Not to mention it's a race to the bottom in terms of posting the most low-effort, low-quality content because they tend to get the most upvoted. It doesn't do anything to encourage nuance or thoughtful interaction.
    - local_crmdgeon 3y ago
      Correct, and a lot of it is posting either very short comments, which are parsed easily, or very long comments that seem like they are correct by length alone (Bardfinn and PoppinKream). Neither has much to do with being "good" comments
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
MikusR 3y ago
You must be looking at some niche topics then.
itsoktocry 3y ago
>Ragebait is usually handled well Because there's a monoculture here, and you are part of it (so am I, for the most part). Pay attention to topics even moderately political and see what happens to comments that fall outside the accepted norm.
- verisimi 3y ago
  Indeed - it is a monoculture that pays lip service to science, but actually is all about consensus.
  - pjmorris 3y ago
    If I've understood what's said about Thomas Kuhn's 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions', even science is all about consensus. I'm fond of Max Planck's “a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”, or its pithy summary "science advances one funeral at a time."
    - verisimi 3y ago
      You think science is what the consensus says it is, even if you cannot personally verify it? If that's it, what exactly is the difference between science and religion?
      - anonymous_sorry 3y ago
        Science is primarily a methodology, and secondarily a body of provisional knowledge discovered and tested via that methodology. As non practitioners, if we trust in the methodology, then to some extent we have to take a shortcut and make decisions based on the consensus judgement of expert practitioners. And, unlike some religious people, accept we can never act in absolute certainty.
        verisimi 3y ago
goodbyesf 3y ago
> This site doesn't even have half the problems as most social media. All social media has the same problems. This site is no different. It is just a smaller social media - essentially a single subreddit with one mod who you agree with. > And there is no customised feed, everyone sees the same thing. The entire site is a customized feed which everyone sees after it has been customized.

adql 3y ago

...people look at other people's karma on reddit ?

local_crmdgeon 3y ago
The karma of individual comments absolutely changes the way people interact with them
- ljm 3y ago
  Not to mention it's a race to the bottom in terms of posting the most low-effort, low-quality content because they tend to get the most upvoted. It doesn't do anything to encourage nuance or thoughtful interaction.
  - local_crmdgeon 3y ago
    Correct, and a lot of it is posting either very short comments, which are parsed easily, or very long comments that seem like they are correct by length alone (Bardfinn and PoppinKream). Neither has much to do with being "good" comments
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

MikusR 3y ago

You must be looking at some niche topics then.

itsoktocry 3y ago

>Ragebait is usually handled well Because there's a monoculture here, and you are part of it (so am I, for the most part). Pay attention to topics even moderately political and see what happens to comments that fall outside the accepted norm.

verisimi 3y ago
Indeed - it is a monoculture that pays lip service to science, but actually is all about consensus.
- pjmorris 3y ago
  If I've understood what's said about Thomas Kuhn's 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions', even science is all about consensus. I'm fond of Max Planck's “a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”, or its pithy summary "science advances one funeral at a time."
  - verisimi 3y ago
    You think science is what the consensus says it is, even if you cannot personally verify it? If that's it, what exactly is the difference between science and religion?
    - anonymous_sorry 3y ago
      Science is primarily a methodology, and secondarily a body of provisional knowledge discovered and tested via that methodology. As non practitioners, if we trust in the methodology, then to some extent we have to take a shortcut and make decisions based on the consensus judgement of expert practitioners. And, unlike some religious people, accept we can never act in absolute certainty.
      - verisimi 3y ago

goodbyesf 3y ago

> This site doesn't even have half the problems as most social media. All social media has the same problems. This site is no different. It is just a smaller social media - essentially a single subreddit with one mod who you agree with. > And there is no customised feed, everyone sees the same thing. The entire site is a customized feed which everyone sees after it has been customized.