4 ms·
What would be the point of a warning?
by andrewstuart 3y ago
What would be the point of a warning?
- dweekly 3y agoGetting folks to shelter and thus increasing the survival rate of the population?
- jacquesm 3y agoYou might be able to get to a high point in time.
- mrguyorama 3y agoA sense of Duty to your people? I think people deserve the 8 minute warning to the end if it's possible. It's not right for the government to decide that "there's nothing to do about it", as the second a nuke launches, any ideas of "right" or "wrong" is moot and pointless, and all of philosophy goes down the drain. You have several minutes to have the last thoughts and sentences you will ever see. Say and do the things that matter to you in those moments. So what if people panic and murder or attack each other or loot or anything else? In a nuclear exchange, I'd argue pure and unadulterated anarchy is the only morally correct option, as the concept of "state" and "society" just failed catastrophically.