4 ms·

Yes, but at some point one has come out of the theory domain and face the real world. So in practical terms it’s closer to a bug and even the “official” guys fr

Yes, but at some point one has come out of the theory domain and face the real world. So in practical terms it’s closer to a bug and even the “official” guys from Java accepted it as a bug.

ris58h 3y ago
Could you provide a link to the documentation to proof it's a bug? The author could call it 'probably bug' or 'misleading String constructor documentation' but instead they state it's a bug without any proofs.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- PedroBatista 3y ago
  Here: https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug?bug_id=JDK-8311906 https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug?bug_id=JDK-831190... It was accepted as a bug. I'm not saying I would condemn anyone to the death penalty based on that but being accepted as a bug there has to have a significant weight attached to it.
  - ris58h 3y ago
    > It was accepted as a bug. I know. It was in this thread above. So there is no link to the specification to proof that it's a bug.