6 ms·

I agree. While commendable, OP complicates matters greatly by declaring war on indecency and incompetence. What’s wrong with penises and bad drawings?

simultsop 3y ago
I guess penises do not belong to the movie being drawn.
noduerme 3y ago
Seriously. People spend thousands to travel to Pompeii and walk through tittering about how naughty the Romans were. It's not as if those Romans were any different from the guy drawing dicks on a blank webpage. And if 2 measly millennia is all it takes to confer archaeological significance on phallic graffiti, why not just get ahead of the herd, take the long view (so to speak), and appreciate your own culture in all its messy future significance in the here and now?
bryanrasmussen 3y ago
by allowing penis drawings it pulls any artwork generated to be penis focused. Crowdsourced art suffers if it can only ever be about the penis is mightier than the sword. Bad drawings likewise limit the aesthetic of what is possible.
- vhlhvjcov 3y ago
  > by allowing penis drawings it pulls any artwork generated to be penis focused As demonstrated by this conversation, Q.E.D > Bad drawings likewise limit the aesthetic of what is possible Are we to reason about aesthetics?
maushu 3y ago
Well, the problem is some of those aren't even drawings. Some minimum effort should be made even if you don't want to trace the frame.
- SanderNL 3y ago
  So nice penises are ok?
gorjusborg 3y ago
There's nothing wrong with it morally, at least in my opinion. There's just the practical issue of how to deal with all the penis drawings. Also, it is just annoying behavior. People think they are being funny, but it is the equivalent of a child writing P O O P everywhere. It is mildly fun for them, but tiresome for everyone else. It isn't in the spirit of the group effort, and just takes the fun out of it for people who actually want to make something.

simultsop 3y ago

I guess penises do not belong to the movie being drawn.

noduerme 3y ago

Seriously. People spend thousands to travel to Pompeii and walk through tittering about how naughty the Romans were. It's not as if those Romans were any different from the guy drawing dicks on a blank webpage. And if 2 measly millennia is all it takes to confer archaeological significance on phallic graffiti, why not just get ahead of the herd, take the long view (so to speak), and appreciate your own culture in all its messy future significance in the here and now?

bryanrasmussen 3y ago

by allowing penis drawings it pulls any artwork generated to be penis focused. Crowdsourced art suffers if it can only ever be about the penis is mightier than the sword. Bad drawings likewise limit the aesthetic of what is possible.

vhlhvjcov 3y ago
> by allowing penis drawings it pulls any artwork generated to be penis focused As demonstrated by this conversation, Q.E.D > Bad drawings likewise limit the aesthetic of what is possible Are we to reason about aesthetics?

maushu 3y ago

Well, the problem is some of those aren't even drawings. Some minimum effort should be made even if you don't want to trace the frame.

SanderNL 3y ago
So nice penises are ok?

gorjusborg 3y ago

There's nothing wrong with it morally, at least in my opinion. There's just the practical issue of how to deal with all the penis drawings. Also, it is just annoying behavior. People think they are being funny, but it is the equivalent of a child writing P O O P everywhere. It is mildly fun for them, but tiresome for everyone else. It isn't in the spirit of the group effort, and just takes the fun out of it for people who actually want to make something.