Well obviously (or so I thought) was referring to how it's modeled (with the crazy codes and all) based on the way the system currently is -- not on how the sys

Well obviously (or so I thought) was referring to how it's modeled (with the crazy codes and all) based on the way the system currently is -- not on how the system "should be". The comment I was responding to just seemed to be saying: "Gee, this is complicated." Well yeah. Because what it has to do is (based on the way things are presently, and beyond anyone's ability to change in the near-term) complicated. Crazy billing codes are a pain signal. They aren't the underlying malady itself.