3 ms·
Did you decrease the USB ALSA period to the lowest practical value (eg. 128 or so)? In theory this provides finer-grained position updates and better stability
by nyanpasu64 3y ago
Did you decrease the USB ALSA period to the lowest practical value (eg. 128 or so)? In theory this provides finer-grained position updates and better stability at any given latency, but I'm not sure how it interacts with USB's polling rate.
- CameronNemo 3y agoYes, the latency increases, the audio quality worsens, and I see the following messages in Pipewire's logs: [W][30498.719355] spa.alsa | [ alsa-pcm.c: 2478 spa_alsa_read()] steinberg_ur44_mono_in:UR44,0,2: follower delay:4042 target:4832 thr:256, resync (374 missed)
- nyanpasu64 3y agoOuch that's unfortunate :(