3 ms·
This is like saying "California purchased enough flashlights for one sunlight beam". Nonsensical at best, but shows a lack of even a high-school level of physic
by exabrial 3y ago
This is like saying "California purchased enough flashlights for one sunlight beam". Nonsensical at best, but shows a lack of even a high-school level of physics education on Unit comparison and conversion.
5 "nukes" eh?
> The state now has enough large-scale batteries to supply 5,600 megawatts of electricity
Last I checked, batteries are measured in watt-hours. Ope, I just rechecked, they still are. Technically my car battery could produce 5,600 megawatts. Granted it might only do that for a femtosecond, but thats the whole point: 5,600 megawatts for _how long_? One minute, one hour?
Also last I checked, the Boobs by the Sea produced 2,200 megawatts of power. That [nearly] continuous power, not "until muh batteries run out". Yes yes, ramp up times, blah blah, refueling, ::hand waving::, xenon poisoning, ::more hand waving::
So congrats, 5.6gw of power storage _is_ awesome, but it's not "5 nukes" any more than 5 apples are the same as three lasers. I'm 100% behind these storage projects as they reduce the need for "peaker plants", but come on, lets at least a high schooler review these articles for scientific accuracy before going to press.
- sdflhasjd 3y agoI can't read the whole article as it's paywalled, but source of the claim comes from CAISO, and they've referring to 5GW of actual network capacity for "up to four hours" http://www.caiso.com/Documents/new-storage-milestone-reached-for-the-california-grid-more-than-5000-mw-now-available-for-dispatch.pdf http://www.caiso.com/Documents/new-storage-milestone-reached... This is actually a serious amount of power storage > Technically my car battery could produce 5,600 megawatts Technically it can't