3 ms·
The threat model assumes that any code in a VM can, with some application of effort, access anything else in that VM. Given the relatively low cost of local ro
by Syonyk 3y ago
The threat model assumes that any code in a VM can, with some application of effort, access anything else in that VM. Given the relatively low cost of local root exploits and kernel exploits, this is reasonable. Passwordless sudo is simply a reminder that you can't rely on intra-vm separation of anything you care about separating.
If you wanted to add additional hardening within a VM, it's supported - create your own templateVM for it, and use it. It's just not the default, and I generally agree with it. If you trust the OS kernel and features to keep things separated, there's no reason to run Qubes in the first place.
- beardog 3y ago>If you trust the OS kernel and features to keep things separated, there's no reason to run Qubes in the first place. Yeah i see the argument - thats why I would still call Qubes very secure as is - but i personally prefer defense in depth. Mainly it would be helpful on machines with limited ram that can only run a few domains at once.