4 ms·
Ah, so basically this is typically used as lossy compression with a constant bit rate, which makes the bandwidth usage predictable/constant but depending on the
by someplaceguy 3y ago
Ah, so basically this is typically used as lossy compression with a constant bit rate, which makes the bandwidth usage predictable/constant but depending on the pictures being shown (and the noise level?), it can lead to some visual degradation (which they say is usually imperceptible).
That's interesting and surprising to me.
- chx 3y agoIf you consider how ~1:18 is considered visually lossless for x.264, a compression of 1:3 is very very likely can be achieved visually lossless indeed.