> There was never even a hint of being pushed to non-replaceable batteries from "higher up" for "reasons". Instead, it was product specs / design parameters tha

> There was never even a hint of being pushed to non-replaceable batteries from "higher up" for "reasons". Instead, it was product specs / design parameters that drove the choice. Cynically, we should be so lucky to have such crudely overt messaging. I would expect the reasons to take the form of specs and design parameters and not be so blunt. The NSA has done just that in the past. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/09/the-nsas-work-to-make-crypto-worse-and-better/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/09/the-n...