I agree that companies will do whatever they can to cut costs, including anything which can remove the necessity of a human worker via automation. But I think t

I agree that companies will do whatever they can to cut costs, including anything which can remove the necessity of a human worker via automation. But I think this comment is not responding to what was written (maybe there was an edit I missed): > Obviously humans will always be involved in coming up with moderation policy This comment seems to respond to: > Obviously humans will always be involved in [moderation] The first statement seems to hold true -- at least, it's a more "obvious" conclusion. What scenario is required to fully remove humans from coming up with moderation policy? These companies who are so eager to automate certain tasks will likely still be staffed by humans who would make the decision to automate certain tasks.