4 ms·
I love how in the age of good old PHP, Django and alike this would be insanity. But with serverless it makes sense I guess.
by tomas789 3y ago
I love how in the age of good old PHP, Django and alike this would be insanity. But with serverless it makes sense I guess.
- nevodavid10 3y agoCan you elaborate on this? ^_^
- rglullis 3y agoThe point is that this crazy architecture could (perhaps) only be justified if all my backend is outsourced to external serverless points. The moment that I need to have my own backend to manage some data, I can add the item rating data as well and your system becomes more complex than the built-in solution.
- nevodavid10 3y agoI am going to make a lighter version of it! Just redis, websockets and Mongodb!
- bastawhiz 3y agoNonsense! You could build this with Django Channels with no problem. There's nothing about this system that makes Django (or really any other framework) a poor choice.
- tomas789 3y agoMy point was quite the other way around. With those legacy tools it is very simple and most people would just build the feature. Serverless adds more friction if you don’t have a suitable backend. And this makes sense then.