4 ms·
Why would an LLM be any less copyrightable than any other piece of software?
by fallingknife 3y ago
Why would an LLM be any less copyrightable than any other piece of software?
- meithecatte 3y agoThe software is the matrix multiplication and gradient descent. We are talking about the numbers in the matrices. They are the output of a training algorithm, so we can only talk about the copyright on the training algorithm, and on its input data.
- abtinf 3y agoFor the same reason that phone books cannot have copyright.
- KingMob 3y agoThe model weights could be seen as a derived work, for which they didn't get the permission of the original copyright holders. Alternatively, it can be argued that the LLMs are no different than a fanfic writer trying to imitate the style of their favor author. It's not obvious which way it will go, but I can see the point of those arguing that LLM data are ill-gotten gains.
- nokcha 3y agoThe "software" part of an LLM is pretty trivial -- the interesting piece is the the weights. Since the weights are mechanically generated by a computer, it can be argued that the weights are not copyrightable, just like a photograph taken by a monkey isn't copyrightable.