5 ms·
Yeah for sure! The tricky, prickly part of talking about FP is that we get into semantics a lot (eg. I'm sure there's Haskell experts who wouldn't consider Jav
by Waterluvian 3y ago
Yeah for sure! The tricky, prickly part of talking about FP is that we get into semantics a lot (eg. I'm sure there's Haskell experts who wouldn't consider JavaScript's `Array.prototype` functions to count as FP). Generally I'm thinking about `foo.map` vs. `for n in foo...`. Maybe "imperative" is a bit of a loaded term for this point.