3 ms·
Fantastic, now we have duopoly
by DoryMinh 3y ago
Fantastic, now we have duopoly
- alpark3 3y ago> monopoly
- gberger 3y agoThere is no moat.
- usaar333 3y agoSeems inferior to GPT-4 on every test I've given it - but as a competitor to GPT 3.5 is strong.
- abdullin 3y agoOn our benchmarks, Claude v1 beats GPT-3.5 (v0613) while v2 looses to it.
- ianhawes 3y agoIMO the rankings of publicly available LLMs are: 1. GPT-4 2. Claude 2 3. Bard 4. Llama/Alpaca 5-98. [Unclaimed] 99. SmarterChild AIM bot 100. Cohere All joking aside, I do agree with the sentiment that no one generally has any type of defensible moat at the moment. OpenAI has found a great balancing act between first mover advantage, marketing, customer adoption, and enterprise sales. They are executing at a high level. Anthropic (Claude) has a wonderful product but is lacking in consumer adoption and sales, though I think they're working on fixing that.
- ilrwbwrkhv 3y agoAll the AI companies are sort of doing a VC rush, but instead of IPO it's AGI. Would be fun to see what we get in the future. Since a serious training run costs upwards of $50 million currently.
- AviationAtom 3y agoI think the reason Claude isn't further than it is now is due to a singular goal: Do no evil I feel they are what Google was to search engines when they burst onto the scene. They'd rather take time to get it right than to push out a product they don't feel meets it's mark. Now that they have entered open beta I expect them to rapidly iterate. If their product is as good as I feel it already is, in comparison to competitors, then I can only imagine what it will be doing in a year's time. (Disclaimer: I do have exposure to Anthropic through my investments, but nothing I said is based on that alone)