4 ms·
20 years ago would be accurate.
by cpncrunch 3y ago
20 years ago would be accurate.
- jcranmer 3y agoMy understanding is that pre-Clovis evidence really starts mounting in the early 90's, and by 2000 or so, there's not really any Clovis-First proponents among the archaeologists doing the work, although other people do take longer to get the message.
- brudgers 3y ago20 years from now would be accurate too. The future is not evenly distributed and the past isn't even past.