4 ms·
I like it. I didn’t realize that “diverging to zero” was a thing—wonder if that’s what the author had in mind, or if there’s an example with real divergence.
by NotYourLawyer 3y ago
I like it. I didn’t realize that “diverging to zero” was a thing—wonder if that’s what the author had in mind, or if there’s an example with real divergence.
- scterg 3y agoIndeed. I didn't realize "diverging to zero" with a thing either. I do think this is what the author had in mind, since he writes about the sum of the logs, "whose convergence is equivalent to the convergence of the product".
- NotYourLawyer 3y agoYeah, but that’s in the context of the theorem that requires the terms to be greater than zero.