3 ms·
As opposed to the unaccountable board of a non-profit raking in significant income? Where they can pay themselves a nice bonus if they make more money for the n
by HWR_14 3y ago
As opposed to the unaccountable board of a non-profit raking in significant income? Where they can pay themselves a nice bonus if they make more money for the non-profit?
- waihtis 3y ago[flagged]
- tnel77 3y agoIt doesn’t feel like they are trolling. They gave a legitimate response and you don’t like it. It’s a valid concern that I feel you should address.
- waihtis 3y agoIts a completely unproductive answer. Why do you assume a non-profit set up for a cause will predominantly exist to pay it's directors bonuses? Lets deconstruct the three options on the table: 1) for-profit private -> exists to make money to their shareholders 2) government -> exists to (on paper) provide services to the people, but has a plethora of other reasons of existence (provide jobs for people, provide ego boosts for politicians working in the system) 3) non-profit private -> exists to provide a legal structure around an agreed cause It is certainly possible someone establishes a non-profit to pocket the money for themselves, but it is a very clear violation of the purpose of the whole structure. In the other two, it is completely acceptable to bounce out of the cause of providing a service to the people, as there are other "goals" for the underlying system. Whining about directors paying themselves bonuses a low-IQ bait to start flame wars.
- tnel77 3y agoThey deleted their comment about you being a troll for this response, but I agree with you. I’d like to know what their response is.