I like people, who often under great personal suffering go against society and it's mostly instinct derived natural truths. They do not have to be always right.

I like people, who often under great personal suffering go against society and it's mostly instinct derived natural truths. They do not have to be always right. But they do need to be there, to keep the scientific option alive. To give unlikely quack-like-truths a starting chance to gather evidence and win out against whatever is closest to the emotional heuristics that optimized us for a eternal cycle of strife. I like contrarians, but they must hate there own opinions or ideas. Like a cancer you want to get rid of, but keeps growing as therapies (counter-arguments) fail and which society just can't accept because it provides no comfort, no ideological blanket, it just replaces a old problem and it's solution with new problems and no solution. PS: Contrarians can not be right if there is no free market allowing the dead to fail. Your dysfunction to build ships does not proof the dysfunction of the guy warning about icebergs.