"Technically correct"? That seems like the same concept. > as well as renting generally -- those kinds of transfers are not allowed without author approval. C

"Technically correct"? That seems like the same concept. > as well as renting generally -- those kinds of transfers are not allowed without author approval. Could you elaborate? If I set up a used car rental service in Sweden, and that car includes a user manual, then do I need permission from the copyright owner to include that manual in the rental? > in combination with Biblioteksersättningen On the topic of "technically correct", https://sv-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Biblioteksers%C3%A4ttning?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp https://sv-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Biblioteksers... tells me that technically it's not part of copyright: ] This is because it only benefits domestic authors. In the Nordic countries, library compensation has not been part of international copyright but part of national cultural policy. Other consequences of this are that the library compensation has a maximum amount, so that the most borrowed authors do not receive compensation in proportion to the lending and that no compensation is paid for loans from research libraries. That quote tells me the payout is not proportionally divided.