4 ms·
I think that is an important milestone. An OS whose hardware support is largely closed source on one side and painfully reverse-engineered on the other. Thisnk
by notorandit 3y ago
I think that is an important milestone.
An OS whose hardware support is largely closed source on one side and painfully reverse-engineered on the other. Thisnk about the graphics hardware.
For years, during the desktop boom in the 2000s, most of the support for networking hardware, wired and wireless, was based on binary blobs coming from Windows OSs and "imported" into a Linux system. How could you dare to use Linux as a desktop?
As of today still most of the PC hardware comes with Windows preinstalled. It would be like offering people pink cars which they can paint in a different color, more or less.
Nope. I think 3% is a lot if you take into account the amount of efforts needed for people to contrastate the so-called "market push".
Linux world is "fragmented" by definition: each main tool and even desktop environment has a number of variants, developed by smallish (fragmented) teams in the name of freedom and choice. Windows, on the other side, has a basically monolithic environment in the name of ... dunno what. Normal (non-techie) people are scared by Linux. Because they have never tried the blue pill. They have never seen how deep the rabbit hole can be.
- hardware2win 3y ago>Windows, on the other side, has a basically monolithic environment in the name of ... dunno what. Consistency, stability?
- notorandit 3y agoStability and consistency is a Windows illusion. Can you run a Windows PC for months without rebooting (no OS update)? To me it's more market grip on people that prefers chains to freedom, not thinking to thinking.
- hardware2win 3y agoI dont know, Im always turning my computer off when not using.
- DeathArrow 3y ago>Windows, on the other side, has a basically monolithic environment in the name of ... dunno what. macOS does it, too. Android does it, too. Basically any os that cares about human interaction.