3 ms·
I thought nations and the species were composed of women, so what is worse for women is probably worse for them too. Or are women outside of nations and the spe
by Veraticus 3y ago
I thought nations and the species were composed of women, so what is worse for women is probably worse for them too. Or are women outside of nations and the species?
- matheusmoreira 3y agoCome on. Life depends on reproduction to sustain itself. That's completely at odds with the current status quo where both men and women postpone or even forgo reproduction for economic reasons. How are you supposed to have a human race if it doesn't reproduce? What's good for the individual does not necessarily align with what's good for the collective.
- Veraticus 3y agoThere are 8 billion people on the planet and the population is still growing. Concern trolling about the future of humanity itself is pretty dumb given that, don't you think? Though maybe not quite as silly as claiming that the individual desires of women don't matter but the individual desires of men do, given that there are more women than men. Certainly women's voices compromise more of the collective than men's voices, given there are more women, hmm?
- matheusmoreira 3y ago> Concern trolling about the future of humanity itself is pretty dumb given that, don't you think? No, I don't think so. It's still growing for now because there are still countries with birth rates above replacement. It is slowing down though. It's expected to peak and start its decline at the end of this century. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/07/1122272 https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/07/1122272