Seems like a bit of a trolly-problem: keep doing what you've always been doing, by tradition and contracts, and statically cause more deaths; or make a choice t

Seems like a bit of a trolly-problem: keep doing what you've always been doing, by tradition and contracts, and statically cause more deaths; or make a choice to change and save more lives overall, but some new deaths will be blamed on your choice. It will be hard to get people to see that the policy shift that caused one unfortunate heart-attack victim to die because the ambulance came slower (perhaps because the person calling 911 didn't realize it was a heart attack, so made it seem like it was non-emergency) potentially saved the lives of some other invisible, unknowable people.