3 ms·
Radix is important for digit-efficiency, but in a biological system that's not necessarily related to molecule size efficiency.
by Llamamoe 3y ago
Radix is important for digit-efficiency, but in a biological system that's not necessarily related to molecule size efficiency.
- pythonguython 3y agoI’m also failing to see how digit efficiency would be important in DNA. In fact, it seems that a high base system would be more efficient. If you had 80 nucleobases instead of 4, each base pair would contain far more information
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> If you had 80 nucleobases instead of 4, each base pair would contain far more information Which is a problem given DNA is a lossy format.
- Llamamoe 3y agoStrictly speaking, you could encode more error-correction bits into a higher nucleobase count but that'd pretty much require intelligent design, and wouldn't necessarily be viable for microorganisms to have that many proteins handling all the metabolic scaffolding.
- asimpletune 3y agoThe efficiency comes from the ratio of the alphabet to the number of character places needed to express them. Otherwise why not base a million? Or a billion? This ratio is what leads to base e being the theoretical maximum.