4 ms·
It's more a measurement of how useful you appear to rich people. You can't make money being useful to people without money. You can make money convincing rich p
by a_cardboard_box 3y ago
It's more a measurement of how useful you appear to rich people. You can't make money being useful to people without money. You can make money convincing rich people you're useful to them when you're not.
- vorpalhex 3y agoLots of businesses make money from people who are poor. Your average McDonalds demographic.
- robertlagrant 3y ago> It's more a measurement of how useful you appear to rich people. You can't make money being useful to people without money. I disagree that the two types of people are "rich people" and "people with no money"; the latter of which is vanishingly rare in developed countries. > You can make money convincing rich people you're useful to them when you're not. You can, but I don't think this accounts for all or most or much movement of money.
- mahathu 3y ago>the latter of which is vanishingly rare in developed countries. You may live in a bubble
- robertlagrant 3y agoHence the limiting of things to developed countries.
- mahathu 3y agoEven in developed countries many people live in poverty!
- robertlagrant 3y agoThat's partly because the word "poverty" gets redefined. It doesn't mean "people with no money", which is the only statement being challenged.