I find the maintainer of Linux Lite to be rather confrontational, but it's actually not a bad distro. It's Ubuntu with Xfce, increasingly the most sensible no-

I find the maintainer of Linux Lite to be rather confrontational, but it's actually not a bad distro. It's Ubuntu with Xfce, increasingly the most sensible no-mess-no-fuss Linux desktop, and no Snap. That's good. It looks nicer than Xubuntu, and it has a bunch of handy little helper apps and accessories. That's good. Snags: * Chrome is not FOSS * No more modern office suite, which seems like something the target market might want. * No replacement for Snap and Flatpak. A worthwhile alternative is Zinc. It's also Ubuntu with Xfce and a better setup than Xubuntu, with Snap removed. However, Zinc sticks with a natively-packaged FOSS browser, and it has something instead of Snap or Flatpak: `deb-get` and integrated Appimage support.