4 ms·
I don't think the moat for food delivery is big enough that capturing the market and hiking prices is a realistic option. Uber eats already has plenty of compet
by Shaanie 3y ago
I don't think the moat for food delivery is big enough that capturing the market and hiking prices is a realistic option. Uber eats already has plenty of competition (at least in my country) from foodora, wolt and bolt food.
- Eisenstein 3y agoSo, with a net income of -$9 billion, what is their business plan, then? * https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/uber/company-profile?mod=mw_quote_tab https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/uber/company-pro...
- CodeSgt 3y agoAre you arguing that Uber’s business model isn’t sustainable or that it’s bad for both parties? Uber being in the red doesn’t mean it’s a net negative for everyone.
- Eisenstein 3y agoOperating at a loss drives out anyone who doesn't have the money to burn forever to compete with you, and when the market is yours you can re-align prices to allow profit. This seems clear to me and the 'net negative' is that you don't actually have a free market anymore. Inserting yourself between product and fulfillment and taking the surplus value that would have gone to either customer or producer is not a gain for anyone but the people who invested in the rent-seeker.