> Maybe wlroots should have OpenBSD-specific parts to its backend abstraction that use OpenBSD's usual input handling primitives. My (shallow and likely out-of

> Maybe wlroots should have OpenBSD-specific parts to its backend abstraction that use OpenBSD's usual input handling primitives. My (shallow and likely out-of-date) impression was that wlroots the library baking in Linux things was a more serious problem for porting than Wayland the protocol actually mandating anything seriously Linux-specific (I understand how the choice to use Linux key codes might be annoying, but still, meh). Have they gotten around to excising the event loop library out of there, for example?