3 ms·
> wasn't illegally collected I understand this technicality; it doesn’t seem to answer my question, though I may have presented it poorly. If it’s ostensibly “
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
> wasn't illegally collected
I understand this technicality; it doesn’t seem to answer my question, though I may have presented it poorly. If it’s ostensibly “wrong” (as some proxy) to collect something, it doesn’t matter how it was acquired given there’s still some intact collection.
- vacuity 3y agoIf the rules are ironclad (in an ideal world) then you're right about 3 violating 1. In the current world, don't count on it.