3 ms·

I still think having multiple display server implementation is a mistake. Qt/KDE is lagging behind and there are no easy way for them to catch up. Had the disp

• happymellon 3y ago
  But that's KDEs fault. They want to have everything built in-house, they could join forces with Sway/WLRoots but when approached they declined. I am fine with having multiple implementations, we don't want to get stuck with a defacto standard, but don't blaming KDEs choices on Wayland.
• kaba0 3y ago
  It’s not ideal, but what is the alternative? We couldn’t even agree about an implementation language, and there are many more decisions that are display-server specific. Wlroots is there for those who wants it and can agree with its design tradeoffs and it is used by plenty niche wms, so I think we have it as good as is feasible in a bazaar style, “everyone works on what they like” fashion. Without a higher power to spearhead a single project there can’t really be a difference.