4 ms·
…Exactly because we put a stop to it, before higher levels became more prevalent. Or are you going to argue about how antibodies work?
by aydyn 3y ago
…Exactly because we put a stop to it, before higher levels became more prevalent.
Or are you going to argue about how antibodies work?
- resolutebat 3y agoWe've been using PFAS for 80 years now. Are the children of heavily exposed people actually contracting diphtheria or tetanus at measurably higher rates? Again, the headline figure you're quoting sounds alarming, but if it's accurate and applicable to the broader population, then we should be seeing that effect outside the lab as well.
- LoganDark 3y ago> We've been using PFAS for 80 years now. Are the children of heavily exposed people actually contracting diphtheria or tetanus at measurably higher rates? Should we wait for that to happen if the risk is obvious?
- peteradio 3y agoDon't the kids of mothers heavily exposed wind up deformed?
- resolutebat 3y agoEntirely possible, but that's quite different from them being more vulnerable to diphtheria, which was the specific claim made earlier in this thread.
- aydyn 3y agoYoure really going to bat for this? Incredible.