But this is only relevant to copyright - and more over, when it comes to derivative works, only relevant to commercial impact. An LLM outputting a summary of s

But this is only relevant to copyright - and more over, when it comes to derivative works, only relevant to commercial impact. An LLM outputting a summary of someone's work (1) doesn't create a new copyright work (so no profit can be derived from it's sale) but (2) would fail the test of whether it was competing with the original copyright work. i.e. no one looking for a summary of a comedy skit is then going to consume that in preference to consuming the original skit. If you tried to argue that was the case, you'd then have to answer why a human review or wikipedia summary does not consitute an infringement.