4 ms·

how could someone "prove" which inputs and outputs of a large ML model leveraged any specific data?

• echelon 3y ago
  That's her and her legal team's homework assignment.
  • preseinger 3y ago
    no, it isn't it's an unsatisfiable requirement, and unnecessary to substantiate the legal claims it's dumb to talk about
    • echelon 3y ago
      > it's an unsatisfiable requirement, There's a wealth of primary literature describing means to probe models for the training data. There's also discovery and a whole host of other processes to answer this question. The plaintiff that filed the lawsuit should prove what they allege. > unnecessary to substantiate the legal claims Why? What if the model has absolutely zero of her data in it? Should she even be allowed to bring this case to court? > it's dumb to talk about Absolutely not! It's central to the entire case. Even if her data is in the model, there's still a question of whether or not she should be compensated. I'd argue no for the same reason that babies that grow up watching Disney don't owe their entire intellectual output to the company.