4 ms·
This has been a talking point since wayland was announced. No one is buying it. Wayland is a very clear successor to X11 and OSs are going to choose one or th
by edgyquant 3y ago
This has been a talking point since wayland was announced. No one is buying it. Wayland is a very clear successor to X11 and OSs are going to choose one or the other at the end of the day.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoWayland is intended to be a successor, but remains behind in a nonzero number of cases, which is why most Linux distros do in fact ship both.
- badsectoracula 3y ago> OSs are going to choose one or the other at the end of the day. Aside from specialized distros, i don't see why they have to choose only one or the other instead of providing both. Most distros - especially the Debian derivatives - have a ton of alternatives for projects that do more or less the same thing and a bunch of obscure projects, having an X server surely isn't that much of a deal. Of course those that provide a default DE or whatever out of the box will most likely need to choose a default setting, but that is just that: a default setting. Just because my openSUSE Tumbleweed installation came with KDE doesn't mean i had to stick with it instead of replacing it with Window Maker.