4 ms·

… it’s hard to refute that the impact is not negative or that you didn’t intend commercial harm. So this is another thing I don’t understand. Is the claim that

… it’s hard to refute that the impact is not negative or that you didn’t intend commercial harm. So this is another thing I don’t understand. Is the claim that fewer people will buy Silverman’s book because ChatGPT is able to provide a summary? If so, call me skeptical.

flangola7 3y ago
That's not a claim Silverman has to make. "You copied my book without license to do so" is sufficient.