> My point was simply that that question can't even be reached if the maker of the LLMs doesn't have a legal right to fair use in the first place (because they

> My point was simply that that question can't even be reached if the maker of the LLMs doesn't have a legal right to fair use in the first place (because they don't legally own their copy). I agree, and I expect that eventually we will start seeing injunctions against creators requiring them to remove content that they don't have legal access to from their training data sets. And this will probably end up at the Supreme Court.