4 ms·
This refutes the previous post’s claim that chatgpt-4 refuses to even try to provide a summary.
by jmull 3y ago
This refutes the previous post’s claim that chatgpt-4 refuses to even try to provide a summary.
- CydeWeys 3y agoThe part that's interesting is whether the summary is correct, though. Of course, depending on how you prompt it, you might or might not get an outright refusal.
- Wowfunhappy 3y agoNot necessarily, because the models have an element of randomness. Also, I was under the impression that ChatGPT has more "safeguards" (manifesting as a refusal to answer questions) than the raw API.
- jmull 3y agoI don’t doubt the poster was telling the truth when they said they asked for a summary of the book and didn’t get one. It refutes the idea that chatgpt’s inability to provide a summary means it didn’t scan the original text: since it can provide a summary, the argument is entirely spurious.
- ec109685 3y agoIt's also a silly test since there is undoubtably a summary of most books someplace on the web.
- CydeWeys 3y agoYou'd be surprised. There are an ungodly number of books published every year, and the back catalog is huge. You're over-indexing on popular books.
- squeaky-clean 3y agoThe summary it provides is entirely wrong except for the name of the main character.
- AJ007 3y agochatgpt-4 != gpt4 on the openAI playground