3 ms·
Surprisingly the GP didn't include price of the device as a reason, but the 30% Apple cut/likely uplift in price that developers need to charge to recuperate de
by dndn1 3y ago
Surprisingly the GP didn't include price of the device as a reason, but the 30% Apple cut/likely uplift in price that developers need to charge to recuperate development costs - which are far more significant than developer hardware costs.
A non-Apple device without the moat would be better. GP also didn't ask for free apps.
- scarface_74 3y agoYes that must be why there is a thriving profitable market for apps on Android that don’t go through the Play Store. Almost every non game app on the iPhone/iPad of note require a subscription and most outside of the App Store.