3 ms·
This is all under the assumption that this was a sudden collapse while the jet-bridge was fully loaded with people. If the system just lost hydraulic pressure
by dghlsakjg 3y ago
This is all under the assumption that this was a sudden collapse while the jet-bridge was fully loaded with people.
If the system just lost hydraulic pressure slowly during a non-loading time, its entirely possible that it took quite a while to collapse, and no one was near enough to do anything. The forces would be high, but there would be ample time for a human to move.
- ciabattabread 3y ago[flagged]
- wongarsu 3y agoI think there's a big difference between asserting that a very deadly event should have been less deadly, and arguing that an event where nobody was hurt in fact was fairly harmless and was unlikely to seriously hurt or kill anyone.
- dghlsakjg 3y agoAll I said was that rapid catastrophic failure is necessary for any of the injury mechanisms mentioned. Why the snarky comment?