4 ms·
Their first sentence is: > The essay reviews the psychological and physiological evidence for Opponent-Colors Theory and concludes the theory is wrong. Am I s
by parpfish 3y ago
Their first sentence is:
> The essay reviews the psychological and physiological evidence for Opponent-Colors Theory and concludes the theory is wrong.
Am I supposed to interpret “Opponent-Colors Theory” as something specific and different from the general concept of opponent colors?
- weinzierl 3y agoI think so. They seem to distinguish between "Hering’s Opponent Colors (the unique hues)" and "Hering’s theory (the linking proposition)". They only attack Hering's theory = the linking proposition.
- parpfish 3y agogood to see that the difficulty naming things isn't unique to programming