3 ms·
Also, the idea that Twitter (or any individual social network) is somehow The Public Town Square is flawed from the start. Such a thing doesn’t exist. There are
by chasing 3y ago
Also, the idea that Twitter (or any individual social network) is somehow The Public Town Square is flawed from the start. Such a thing doesn’t exist. There are online communities of varying sizes that have different sets of rules that their members (explicitly or implicitly) agree to adhere to. Calling Twitter (or Threads) a “town square” is marketing or corporate fantasy as much as anything. Most people don’t use these services or even really care about them.
(I think of these services more like bars: They’re public places where people go to cavort and socialize, but there’s an expectation of what behaviors are acceptable and an owner, bartender, and bouncer willing to make sure those rules are adhered to. Don’t like it? Find another bar. There are tons.)
- PartiallyTyped 3y agoIt's not even marketing, it's a dog whistle and a means of justifying hosting garbage posted by people with too much time on their hands and too little empathy.
- jmye 3y agoAnd a way to make their own participation seem somehow grander (and not like 99% of the site was utterly toxic 140-character pissing matches and bad faith posturing).