4 ms·
True, but I think slightly pedantic for this context. I think there have been proposed relational operators which produce the result you describe - a join, then
by jimwhite42 3y ago
True, but I think slightly pedantic for this context. I think there have been proposed relational operators which produce the result you describe - a join, then remove the join key fields from the result.
If we are in a pedantic mood, also, a relational-tuple is not exactly the same as a mathematical tuple, relational tuples take different forms depending on who's system you are following (e.g. whether the fields are ordered or not).
- keithalewis 3y agoJust endeavoring to make true statements. A relation on sets A and B is a subset R of the Cartesian product of A and B. E. F. Codd had something else in mind with his definition of join. Do you think he got that wrong?